However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 16, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (special quasi-rape) at the Daejeon High Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 24, 2013.

1. On February 5, 2013, the Defendant defraudeded the victim C with a false seal impression, such as the market name certificate, etc. - On the roads near the E-B bath located in Tong-si, through a false statement, that “A victim C shall obtain a loan of KRW 30 million on his/her face, using a seal impression, a certified copy of resident registration, a certified copy of resident registration, a certified resident registration certificate, a resident registration certificate, and a passbook of community credit cooperatives.”

However, in fact, the defendant obtained a loan for the victim and was not capable of delivering the loan to the victim, and rather, obtained a loan under the victim's name by using the above documents received from the victim, and then acquired the loan by fraud.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained a personal seal impression, a certified copy of resident registration, a certified copy of resident registration, a resident registration certificate, and a passbook of the community credit cooperative on the same day from the victim.

2. Fraud to a social loan corporation E&P from the victim - defraudation of loans;

A. On January 24, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime of January 24, 2013, 2013, the Defendant called a social loan company E&P, which was called the victim E&P, and called the Defendant’s father’s father’s personal information, and made a false statement that 3 million won was available since he/she was working in G through G, and was sufficiently capable of repaying the loan.

However, in fact, the defendant was not F, and the father F of the defendant and the father of the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the above loan, since he had no intention or ability to do so at all.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim and belongs to it.