2. The crime of this case is acknowledged that the crime of this case was committed with injury upon the victim G, interfered with police officers I and J's execution of duties, and at the same time, the crime of this case was not less light.

However, considering the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime; (b) agreed with the victim G; (c) found the victim I to find the victim I; and (d) deposited one million won to I; and (c) did not have any record of criminal punishment so far; and (d) there are no special circumstances or circumstances newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment; (c) the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive and background of the instant crime, means and method of the crime; and (d) other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the instant argument and the record, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is unreasonable because the sentence

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.