대표자지위부존재확인 등 청구의 소
1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
1. Basic facts
A. The status of the parties 1) Defendant EM is the Foman Association of Defendant D Religious Organizations (hereinafter “Defendant Foman Association”) by not later than 2015.
) A church that was affiliated with the D Religious Organization (after that, the D Religious Organization IE was incorporated with the D Religious Organization Jology).
(2) The Plaintiffs are the head of the Defendant E church, Defendant G is a person who has served as a standing tree at the Ectrine conference from September 2015, and Defendant H is a former standing tree.
B. On September 6, 2015, Defendant H, who was a pastor of Defendant G, was a member of Defendant E church, is a joint council with the main agenda of “Defendant H H’s resignation, post-employment and pre-employment, issues of honorable treatment, revision of the articles of association,” and “joint council of September 6, 2015” (hereinafter “joint council of September 6, 2015”).
2) On September 6, 2015, the Joint Council convened and convened the Defendant G and L as a successor candidate for the post-standing pastor.
3) Defendant Ehys carried out a large number of votes on Defendant G and L. From the first large number of votes, only 19 persons who are less than the quorum among 123 persons present at the meeting were present at the voting, and a large number of votes was held again after having given a candidate’s explanation. In the second large number of votes, 96 persons were present at the voting, and 83 persons among them were present at the voting to Defendant G, and the voting was opened to Defendant G as a post-standing pastor (hereinafter “instant wooden voting”).
(C) On October 13, 2015, Defendant FEU received a request for a pastor from Defendant E church G on the part of October 13, 2015. C. Relevant regulations D Religious Organization’s constitutional political division (hereinafter “IS Constitution political division”).
) The detailed rules and the articles of association of the defendant E church related to the issues of this case are as shown in the annexed sheet. [The grounds for recognition] There is no dispute, Gap No. 1, Gap No. 3, Eul No. 4, 5, 22, and 23 (including the number of branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply).
each entry, the purport of the whole pleading
2. Summary of the plaintiffs' assertion
(a) The absence of the status of temporary pastors or the president of a party.