Nos. 1 through 14 of seized evidence from Defendant A, No. 16 to 14.

1. The Defendants’ co-principals are the one of the so-called telephone financial frauds (tentatively called phishing) organization that defrauds the victims by means of transfer of money to the face-to-face passbook account by falsely pretending to a large number of unspecified domestic people, and “to receive a loan, it shall deposit the funds such as notarial expenses, credit rating increase, stamp, guarantee insurance premium, etc. by a certified judicial scrivener who intends to obtain a loan,” etc.

The Defendants: (a) received daily allowances from “D”; (b) examined whether the account for the one-time account is available; and (c) recruited the money transferred through the said method in order with the aforementioned members, including E, to take charge of account transfer or withdrawal through cash withdrawal.

On May 15, 2014, the Defendants conspired with the members of the notarial services in sequential order as above, and made false statements to the victim F by phone call to the victim F. “G agency working in Han Capital. It is intended to grant a loan to a certified judicial scrivener if he/she transfers the notarized expenses.”

In fact, however, there was no intention or ability to provide a normal loan even if the victim F received a notarized expense from one capital employee, not one capital employee.

As can be seen, the Defendants, in collusion with the members in charge of the investigation in name, deceiving the victim F, and then, deceiving him from the victim F to the post office account in the name of H, 85,000 won, as stated in the attached Table No. 1 (excluding No. 11,17, and 17). From May 15, 2014 to May 23, 2014, the Defendants acquired 67,170,991 won in total from the victim 11.

2. No person may transfer or acquire the means of access to electronic financial transactions;

Nevertheless, the defendant, in collusion with B and singishing staff, is a policeman on May 2014.