However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 19, 2018, at around 20:30, the Defendant was asked to ask questions about the circumstances of the instant case from the police box of Daegu Police Station D, who was dispatched to the site after having received a report from the front corridor of the Defendant’s house No. 209, 1503 of the Daegu apartment B, Daegu-gu, 2018, that the Defendant assaulted the wife C in a de facto marital relationship at the seat of the Defendant’s house No. 1503, and sent to the site, and “I am out of the lock, I am down with the police box, and I am.”

In order to hear the words "", he/she committed assault, i.e., selling the ships E of the above circumstances on a one-time basis, and using the buckbuck paper one time, and walking the mouth two times.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the 112 Reporting List, the Act and subordinate statutes governing the place of service;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In light of the defendant's degree of assault, circumstance of crime, etc. for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the nature of the crime in this case is not good. Meanwhile, considering the fact that the defendant committed the crime in this case while recognizing the crime in this case, there is no record of the same crime, the fact that the damaged police officer does not want the punishment of the defendant, and other circumstances shown in the argument in this case including the defendant's health condition, etc.