If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Defendant

A and the victim B are the legal married couple who once re-born for two years.

At around 22:50 on July 26, 2018, the Defendant brought an assault to force the victim's left part of the defect that the victim intends to go to the front line to go to the front line of the C building D, and to go to the front line of the victim, while making the victim go to the front line three times. The Defendant assaulted the victim's left part of the defect that the victim intends to go to the front line.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. Damage photographs (the victim's statement is the victim's attitude and content, and in particular, comparing it with the objective situation before and after the commission of the crime, the credibility of the statement may be recognized as a substitute. The defendant himself/herself, since the police investigation conducted by him/her, stated that "the victim attempted to get out of the right angles of the victim, he/she is provokinged to be protruding over the right angle," or that "the victim attempted to get out of the right angles of the victim, as he/she is about to get out of the right angles of the victim," and recognized that the victim was provokingd against the defendant. The victim's photograph taken from the escape box on the day of the commission of the crime, which is consistent with the victim's statement, is sufficiently proven without reasonable doubt." This case's facts charged is applicable to the law.

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order has been that the defendant committed violent crimes against the victim even before the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and thus the family protect

However, the defendant and the victim present are no longer likely to repeat a crime by divorce, and the defendant are the victim.