However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 01:00 on October 22, 2013, the Defendant, in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, “D” Da, had an examination room for his workplace, and had the victim E (52 years of age) find it out to comply with the Defendant. On the other hand, the Defendant continued to put the back of the victim’s head at one time with the following influences, and continued to put about about 40 days off the victim’s face with drinking materials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statements (the fifth trial records are written);

1. Each statement of witness E and F in the second protocol of the trial;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E in-depth photographs and injury diagnosis reports;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of penalty against the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution [the scope of recommending sentence] violent crime group, general injury (type 1), mitigation area, imprisonment with prison labor for two months to one year [the decision of sentence] no criminal punishment other than a single time (2010) of a fine for this type of fine, reflective contingent crime, the age of the defendant under the agreement, occupation and circumstances of the crime, etc.