However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On July 2, 2020, the Defendant was found in the D Authorized Broker Office in Ansan-si, a member of the Dong-gu, whose wife B works in around 13:00.

F, a police officer, etc. belonging to the police station E police station of the Gyeonggi-do National Police Agency, was carried out in France, and reported to B 112, and called out to the scene.

At around 13:40 on the same day, the Defendant took a bath to the above F who requires the presentation of an identification card at the above place, and assaulted F’s face one time by putting the f’s chest together with f’s chest together with f’s f’s hair together with f’s f’s hair, and f’s f’s face by drinking on the left side.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 report processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes related to police statements by the defendant with respect to F of the defendant's legal statement

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. All circumstances, including the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, degree of violence and obstruction of public duties of the defendant, records of violent crimes such as obstruction of the defendant's performance of official duties, etc., and the fact that the defendant F does not want the punishment of the defendant;