A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with B on its own C vehicles.

B. B, on August 24, 2016, 18:10, 18:10, in the front of the D, the part of the back criminal part of the Defendant’s E-si (hereinafter “Defendant”) was shocked while the Defendant’s private taxi (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) was in the direction of e-mail in the direction of e-mail.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

As a result of the Materno Police Station's request, an analysis was submitted to the effect that there was no significant change in driving that may cause injury to the driver of the Defendant vehicle due to the instant accident. D.

피고는 2015. 10. 29. 0:40 서울 양천구 F에서 발생한 교통사고(이하 ‘이전 사고’)로 인하여 ‘요추의 염좌 및 긴장, 상세불명의 뇌진탕, 두개 내 열린 상처가 없는 둔부의 타박상, 기타 머리 부분의 표재성 손상, 타박상, 흉곽 전벽의 타박상, 기타 및 상세불명의 요추 및 골반 부분의 염좌 및 긴장, 무릎뼈 인대(힘줄)의 손상‘의 상해를 입었고, 이로 인하여 ’G 한의원‘에서 2015. 10. 29.부터 2015. 12. 12.까지 입원치료를, 2015. 12. 14.부터 2016. 8. 24.까지 통원치료를 받았다.

[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence 1, 3, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 2-1, 2-2, and 8, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff asserts that the accident of this case is very minor and thus, the defendant did not suffer any injury, and that there is no liability for damages caused by the accident of this case against the defendant who is the insurer which concluded the insurance contract with B.

B. In regard to this, the defendant's accident of this case, "Week's knee's knee's knee's knee's knee's knee's knee's knee's knee's kne's kne's knee'