However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On August 12, 2014, at around 00:05, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.119% without a vehicle driver’s license, the Defendant driven a vehicle B from the 3km section of approximately 3 km to the front of the 2nd eth eth eth eth eth 32, eth eth eth eth rith eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth

2. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. The Defendant forged private document: (a) the Defendant was required to verify the identity of the Defendant from the slope C belonging to the Leecheon Police Station traffic control department, which controlled the Defendant on the front of the Leecheon-gu Road prior to the date stated in paragraph (1), as if the Defendant was the Defendant’s living together; and (b) made the identity of D; (c) on the basis of D’s personal information, the Defendant was presented with D’s resident registration number, drinking driving circumstances, etc. written on the basis of D’s personal information; and (d) marked “D arbitrarily” on the driver’s signature column and marked the Defendant’s personal seal next to the name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the driver's signature column of D's report on the state of the driver's identity under the name of D, which is a private document of certification of facts.

B. The Defendant’s uttering of the above investigation document is the above 2-A.

At the time, at the time, and at the place specified in the Paragraph, C, which may contain the signature column for the forged driver, issued and exercised the report as if it were duly formed.

3. Events, such as writing, electronic records, etc.; and

A. The Defendant entered and stored D’s resident registration numbers, addresses, and the records of drinking driving control, etc., known to the Defendant in a personal portable device (PDA), at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), and at the same time and place, after a drinking test was conducted by the said slope C, and presented a screen of the portable device, which was conducted after drinking control was conducted by the Defendant. As such, “D” is arbitrarily “D” on the screen operator’s signature.