A. The land survey division prepared at the time of the Japanese occupation occupation period is written by C as the name of the assessment title, and the address of C is not written. The land survey division prepared at the time of the Japanese occupation period is written by C with respect to the 382 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. On May 5, 1969, the land category of this case was changed to a river, and on January 1, 1978, the area was changed to 1263 square meters, and thereafter the administrative district was changed to Macheon-gun (Macheon-gun).

C. As to the instant land, the Defendant completed the registration of initial ownership in its name (hereinafter “registration of initial ownership”) under the title, No. 36874, which was received on December 17, 1996 by the Seo-gu District Court Macheon District Court Macheon Branch Office.

The deceased on April 18, 1939 and the deceased on April 18, 193, the deceased on the part of the plaintiff, the deceased on the part of the plaintiff, and the deceased on December 26, 1956, and the deceased on December 26, 195, the deceased on the part of the plaintiff, the deceased on the part of the plaintiff, the deceased on the part of the deceased on the part of the deceased on the sole inheritance of the property by the deceased on March 4, 1995, the deceased on the part of G, the deceased on the part of the deceased and the deceased on the part of the plaintiff, H

E. The transcript of the above E’s legal domicile is written as I of the Socheon-gun, and it is written as I of the birth guidance of his father born in 1924.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, each entry of Gap evidence 1 to 6 (including virtual number), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. In light of the above facts acknowledged as to the cause of the claim and various circumstances recognized by the above evidence, in particular, in light of the following: (a) the address and the location of the owner’s domicile may be omitted at the time when the Land Survey Board was established in the Japanese colonial Order, in accordance with the Provisional Land Survey Board’s Land Survey Board’s regulations, which is a shipbuilding General Directive; and (b) there is a person who has a name in the same Ri, and (c) there is no evidence to find that there was a person who is a Plaintiff’s evidence D and a person who is the Plaintiff’s evidence, the land in this case is the same person, and therefore, the land in this case is the Plaintiff.