beta
(영문) 대전고등법원 2016.11.25 2015나210 (1)

부당이득반환 등

Text

1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The relevant network D (hereinafter “the network”) of the parties married with E, constituted children F, G, H, I, J, Defendant, and the Plaintiffs, and died on October 21, 201.

B. The deceased, on March 10, 1972, is entitled to a legal relationship with the building of this case. The deceased, on March 10, 1972, K large 321 square meters (hereinafter “instant site”).

(2) On December 22, 1989, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer based on the donation made on December 21, 1989 with respect to the instant building site. (2) The instant building was a building which was on the instant building site, and was constructed on January 4, 1991, and the registration of ownership preservation has not been completed even after the completion of the new construction.

However, the owners on the general building ledger of the instant building are registered as the defendant.

3) 망인은 2008년경부터 ① 원고 A에게 이 사건 건물 지상 1층 중 별지 2 도면 표시 ㉠, ㉡, ㉢, ㉣, ㉤, ㉥, ㉦, ㉠의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 부분 2개 매장(현재 점포 상호 : N, O)의 임차인으로부터 받는 월 차임 300만 원을, ② 원고 B에게 같은 도면 표시 ㉠, ㉦, ㉧, ㉨, ㉩, ㉪, ㉫, ㉬, ㉠의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 부분 2개 매장(현재 점포 상호 : P, Q)의 임차인들로부터 받는 월 차임 270만 원을 매월 위 각 월 차임을 지급받는 E 명의의 계좌에서 원고들의 각 배우자 명의의 계좌로 송금하는 방식으로 각 지급하였다. 4) 한편, 망인이 2011. 10. 21. 사망한 뒤에도 원고들은 위 3 항 기재와 같은 방식으로 임차인들이 매월 지급하는 월 차임 300만 원 또는 270만 원을 지급받았다.

In addition, from March 2012, the Defendant agreed to receive the rent from the lessee and pay it to the Plaintiffs.

However, from March 2012, the defendant's wife from March 2012 to the plaintiff A, KRW 2 million out of the monthly rent of KRW 3 million, and KRW 2.7 million to the plaintiff B.