Where the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

The defendant is the representative of C Co., Ltd. located in Haan-gun B, and D has served as the managing director of C Co., Ltd.

The defendant and D had the retaining wall, which separates the boundary of the F of the Haban-gun E, the complainant, in mind, used it as the access road to the factory by leaving the retaining wall.

On August 2014, the Defendant and D destroyed the retaining wall, which was located in the border line of the Haan-Gun G in the Haan-gun of the Haan-do adjacent to the F of the Haan-gun of the Haan-do owned by the complainant, from around 2006, to remove the retaining wall, which was located in the boundary of the Haan-gun of the Haan-gun of the Haan-do, from the time when the complainant purchased from H around

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect with regard to D (including replacement of a suspect);

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning filing of a complaint, certified copies of each register, drawings, and field photographs;

1. Article 370 of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Articles 370 and 30 of the Criminal Act that choose a penalty;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;