If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On March 1, 2017, from around 18:40 to around 19:24, the Defendant 2719 of “2017 Highest 2719”, while drinking alcohol in the “E main store D” located in the 19:3.3. 1, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the business of the victimized person’s main store by force on account of the victim’s failure to comply with the victim’s demand to leave the said main store, and thereby obstructing the victimized person’s business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as field photographs and 112 report treatment marks;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 314 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which are disadvantageous to the punishment of a workhouse - The defendant has already been punished for violent crimes several times. Recognizing the favorable circumstances - the defendant recognizes all the criminal facts. - The victim does not have to punish the defendant any longer. - The victim’s degree of damage should be taken into account in each of the above circumstances. The sentence as ordered in light of all the conditions of sentencing revealed in the trial process. The dismissal part of the prosecution is dismissed.

1. The Defendant, at around June 27, 2017, 2017, 18:30 on the ground floor of the facts charged, knee knee kne kne kne kne kne kne kn, and assault the victim in drinking three times on the face side of the victim while drinking g (49 years of age) in front of the U.S. 23-16, 258 Linae knit Park in front of the U.S. G (49 years of age) under the influence of drinking g (i.e., drinking g., drinking g., the victim’s kne kne kne kne.

2. Since the facts charged above falls under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, a public prosecution may not be instituted against the clearly expressed will of the victim pursuant to Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act.

In this regard, the victim G does not want to punish the defendant.