The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the Defendant was guilty of all of the facts charged in the instant case’s violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act as of September 26, 2012 and the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence

On the other hand, the Defendant appealed on the remaining convictions of the lower judgment, but did not submit grounds for objection to the appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.