However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 10:00 on August 7, 2012, the Defendant concluded a contract for sales of travel goods with ten Chinese heads, including the victim, for three and five days from September 29 to October 3, 2012, even though the Defendant received the amount as a travel expense from the victim D, the Defendant did not have the ability to send ten Chinese travels, including the victim, according to the terms of the contract entered into with the victim D, even though the Defendant received the amount as a travel expense, and entered it in the contract for sales of travel goods with ten Chinese heads, including the victim, for five days from September 29, 2012 to October 3, 2012. The Defendant appears to have obtained 1.8 million won from the victim as the down payment on August 7, 2012; 7.46 billion won as the intermediate payment on August 17, 2012; and 2.3 million won as the remainder on August 22, 2012.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 347 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that the defendant did not agree with the victim, but he did not have any criminal records of the same kind

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;