For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that convicted of the instant facts charged.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.

Examining various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age and behavior environment, relationship with victims, motive means and consequence of each of the instant crimes, etc., as indicated in the records, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s maintenance of the first instance judgment, which sentenced the Defendant to seven years of imprisonment, is extremely unfair.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.