2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff’s cause of claim 1) On December 11, 2003, the Plaintiff Company C (hereinafter “C”)

D and 8 parcels (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”) located in Si interest-si with the price of KRW 1.2 billion between the Department and the Department

3) On the ground, the construction site for the new apartment (hereinafter “instant construction site”)

(1) On February 20, 204, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant who acquired the status of C on the same date and entered into a contract for the removal and re-treatment of the same content. After that, the Plaintiff had completed most removal and re-treatment and suspended the above work under the condition that it left the treatment equivalent to KRW 100,000. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff received KRW 71,730,000 from the Defendant as part of the price under the above contract. Therefore, the Defendant concluded an agreement with the Plaintiff on the total amount of KRW 1,28,270,00 ( KRW 1.2 billion - KRW 71,730,000) and value-added tax on the unpaid price - KRW 102,827,000,000,000 for KRW 1,300,000,0000 for the above contract, and the Plaintiff was obligated to pay KRW 1,31,09,000,000 for the above contract to the Plaintiff.

Therefore, the defendant is obliged to pay the above KRW 139,780,850 to the plaintiff.

B. The Defendant’s assertion 1 did not conclude a contract between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff for removal and the remaining disposal of the content alleged by the Plaintiff.

The Defendant, from the end of April 2004 to the end of August 2004, managed part of the site of the instant construction and the shipment of wastes to the Plaintiff, and paid 71 million won to the Plaintiff. However, most of the above removal and removal operations from May 2004 to June 2006 are entrusted to the company such as the funeral industry development company, E, one industry development company, etc.