대여금
1. The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
A. The plaintiff is the defendant's dual opinion.
B. While the Defendant resided in the United States, the Plaintiff transferred money on 21 occasions between May 28, 2003 and March 23, 2011 as follows.
(1) USD 2,480, USD 2,50 on May 28, 2004; USD 2,506.85 on January 7, 2004; USD 2,508 on May 10, 204; USD 1,679 on August 9, 204; USD 15,962 on December 15, 2004; USD 2,980 on January 4, 2006; USD 2,63.63,00 on July 25, 2007; USD 1,580 on June 2, 201 on June 3, 201 ($3,000 on June 1, 2005; USD 2,580 on December 31, 200 on May 31, 2007; and USD 4,57,000 on May 31, 2008.
2. The party's assertion and judgment
A. The plaintiff's assertion (1) The defendant alleged that he would repay money to the plaintiff later after leaving a U.S. study, and the plaintiff paid money to the defendant in a situation where it is difficult for the plaintiff to live.
Since the Defendant entered the Republic of Korea around May 2012 and had the Company work as a regular employee on or around January 2013, the Plaintiff paid off the amount of money borrowed from the Defendant as a study fund.
Therefore, while the Defendant paid the Plaintiff the money, the Defendant avoided the Plaintiff’s contact without paying the money at all.
Therefore, the defendant extended a total amount of KRW 127,934,632 to the plaintiff and KRW 127,934,632, including a partial fee, and KRW 7 million lent around July 2006.