beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.02.04 2014고단8183

공무집행방해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 23, 2014, at around 21:56, the Defendant: (a) 112 reported to the Voluntary Security Guards in front of the Yongsan Park Park Park, Nam-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu, 84, while drinking alcohol and booming to the Voluntary Security Guards who was carrying out a patrol; and (b) Daced to the C and police officers of the Incheon Southern Police Station B Police Station B, who was called out after receiving a report of 112, the Defendant: (c) Doced to the police officers, police officers, boms, and boms: (d) Doc, “Is, police officers, and all killed; (d) all boms of the police officers, who will die; and (e) the head of the above C, who recommended the Defendant to return home, to be spawnize “A”, and (e) the Defendant’s head, who bomed the Defendant’s c.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs and field photographs of damaged police officers;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (six to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (decision of sentence] (decision of sentence), criminal liability for a crime against public authority, the fact that the defendant has no obvious criminal record, the fact that the defendant has committed a crime by distinguishing his/her wrong facts, and other conditions of sentencing as stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, character and environment, shall be determined within the scope of the sentence for recommendation, taking into consideration the sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.