A. Defendant D: 1,937,379,476 won

B. A. Joint with Defendant D

Of the amounts described in the subsection, Defendant C, E, and.

A. On December 10, 2014, the Plaintiff was merged with the credit union engaging in the receipt of deposits and installment savings from its members, and the business of lending to its members.

B. The Defendants served as executive officers and employees of the non-party partnership as indicated below.

The number of non-permanent directors from October 21 to December 10, 201 on December 21, 201, 1 B-201 to December 10, 2014: (a) the non-permanent president of October 21, 2005 to October 21, 2005; (b) the non-permanent president of November 21, 2007 to November 201, 201; (c) the director of December 19, 201 to December 19, 201; and (d) the director of December 201 to December 21, 2005 to the non-permanent president of October 21, 2005 to December 19, 201; and (e) the director of 5 F. 01 to December 31, 201 to the non-permanent directors of October 27, 2000 to the president of November 11, 2014.

C. The National Credit Union Federation of Korea on January 31, 2009 conducted a comprehensive inspection of the non-party union, and the same year.

6. Around 15.15. Around the point of view, the non-party union pointed out the violation of the orders of officers and employees, and ② the limit of loans to the same person, requiring disciplinary action against Defendant C, D,

In addition, on May 31, 201, the National Credit Union Federation of Korea conducted a partial inspection of the non-party union on the non-party union, and on September 16, 2011, pointed out that the lending limit exceeds the lending limit and repeated actions against the non-party union, and requested disciplinary action against the defendant C, D, E, and F.

In other words, on October 31, 2014, the National Credit Union Federation of Korea conducted a partial inspection on the non-party union. On April 2, 2015, the Plaintiff pointed out the following: ① occupational embezzlement of the non-party union, ② the volume of dealing with the secured loan, ③ the status of dealing with the secured loan exception, and demanded the Defendants to take disciplinary measures against the Defendants.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 11, and 12, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. General theory on the liability of executive officers and employees of credit unions for damages.

(a) The Credit Unions Act’s duties of officers and employees shall comply with the Credit Union Act, the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, the Articles of Incorporation, the Articles of Incorporation, and the resolution of Congress and the Board of Directors, and shall be faithful to