도로교통법위반(음주운전)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of the facts) found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case, although the Defendant did not drive drinking at the time of this case, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.
2. The Defendant also driven a vehicle on behalf of the Defendant, “The Defendant, while drinking alcohol at the time of the instant case, was fluorously driven by the Defendant, while playing “D folklore shop”.
“The court below rejected the above assertion in detail on the grounds of conviction” among the judgment of the court below. The judgment of the court below is just and it is not erroneous in the misapprehension of facts alleged by the defendant.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.