A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, for each of six months, for each of six months.

except that from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On April 2012, Defendants 2 and 3, who were public officials in charge of the duties such as the reexamination of the answer sheet when Defendant B and C applied for the examination and submit the answer sheet at G restaurant located in the Seocho-si F in Gangwon-si, and at the first higher examination notice conducted by the Gangwon-do Office of Education in 2012, Defendant B and 3 were urged to pass the examination score of Defendant B and Defendant C by raising the examination score of Defendant B and Defendant C by means of the correction, replacement, etc. of the answer sheet.

On April 15, 2012, the Defendants prepared and submitted the answer sheet to Defendant B and Defendant C at the examination site of the above high school located in the original city H from around 09:00 to the original city, and Defendant A, around 12:30 on the same day, found two Korean language, English, and academic answer sheet, which were considered in advance, in the Defendant’s name located in the place of the playground of the sports site of the headquarters office for the examination and public notice of the above high school entry into the Republic of Korea, and followed the Defendant B’s examination number (K) and name, Defendant C’s examination number (L) and name, respectively.

Since then, Defendant A and Defendant C tear teared the answer sheet submitted by Defendant B and Defendant C, and submitted the Korean language, English, and academic answer sheet newly prepared by Defendant B and Defendant C as if they were the answer sheet prepared by Defendant B and Defendant C, and submitted it to the Gangwon-do Office of Education’s policy of teachers via the inspector of the Gangwon-do Office of Education dispatched for examination and supervision.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to observe the duty to prevent such unlawful conduct in order to ensure the fairness of the examination by fraudulent means, and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the teachers' policy of Gangwon-do Office of Education and the supervision of the school officials belonging to the Gangwon-do Office of Education.

2. Defendant A and Defendant B’s co-principal offenders.