However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 29, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 04:02, around 04:02, at the Domotour construction site office operated by the victim C in Simoto; (b) taken off one 350,000 won of the market price, which is the victim’s possession, at the front of the entrance; (c) continued to damage the entrance door of the above office and intrude into the office by using the Domoto; and (d) cut off the above office room in an amount of KRW 700,000 of the market price, which is the victim’s ownership; and (d) cut off the above office room in an amount of KRW 2,950,000 of the market price and the tools in an amount of KRW 2,950,00 of the market price which is the victim’s ownership.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (on-site CCTV investigation);

1. Articles 331(1) and 330 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., the confession and reflect of criminal conduct, the agreement with the victim, the efforts toward a stable workplace than the preceding one with the assistance of the Korea Rehabilitation Agency, and the fact that

1. Probation Orders under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;