beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.02.15 2016고단24

사기미수

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and for ten months, respectively.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Along with the fact that the employees of the single-name Financial Institutions, such as “G” and “H,” were false, and the victim’s financial information, such as the victim’s account number and password, was discovered, and then transferred money from the victim’s account to “I” account. The Defendants, under the above “H”’s instruction, conspired to take the amount of damage from the Defendant’s non-name-based employees of the above phishing (one-name “I”), to deliver the amount of damage to the phishing officer.

In accordance with the above public offering, at around 10:00 on December 9, 2015, the AF Director of the Department of Government Administration to “The Department of Government Administration” by call to the victim J.

A loan can be made at an interest rate of 2.8% up to KRW 38 million, and a loan is granted only when the loan was received from the second financial right to obtain the loan, and the contact is changed. On the same day, the victim applied for the loan to Nonghyup Capital and received KRW 35 million from the victim’s post office account.

Since then, the victim was given a loan to the singing staff in the name of the victim.

On December 10, 2015, at around 09:40 on December 10, 2015, the victim called “the disclosure of the victim’s financial information to the Korea Asset Management Corporation,” and transferred KRW 19 million from the above post office account of the victim to the new bank account (N) with the police officer’s name at around 10:40 on the same day.”

Since then, the above H informed Defendant B of the appearance of “I”, and received KRW 19 million from “I” in the vicinity of the new bank located in Salydong, Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and directed Defendant A to “I”, and Defendant B, upon receipt of the above instruction, was waiting for Defendant A only in the vicinity of the above new bank around 10:00 on the same day, and the same day as Defendant A.