협박
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
1. Around July 6, 2016, the summary of the facts charged: (a) the Defendant sent a text message to the Defendant’s home located in Gwangju-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju-gu, stating that “A victim C was aware of the flasing of the flasing, hinginginginginging the flab, hinginging the flab, and hinginging the flab, once again, the flabing, hinginging the flab, and hinginginging the flab,” and at least 16:58 on the same day, the Defendant sent a text message to the victim’s cell phone, stating that “A flabing the flabing of the flabing, hinging the flab, and hing the f
Accordingly, the defendant threatened each victim.
2. Determination of the facts charged is a crime falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the same Act. It is recognized that C, the victim of the instant indictment, explicitly expressed his/her intention not to punish the Defendant on September 26, 2016, which is the date of the instant indictment.
Therefore, all of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.