Where the above fine is not paid, one million won shall be converted into one day.

On May 6, 2020, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for larceny at the Busan District Court on May 6, 202, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on the 14th of the same month.

1. On April 25, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 17:35 to 17:45 on April 25, 2020, at the Cmate located in Busan, Busan, the Defendant stolen the victim’s property by putting the victim’s property into the fabane where the victim D, who is the fab operator, had been displayed at a different place the gap in which the surveillance was neglected; (b) the figure equivalent to KRW 1 L, market price of KRW 4,00 in an amount equivalent to KRW 5,00 in an amount equal to KRW 3,650 in an amount equal to KRW 3,650 in an diesel, market price of KRW 8,00 in an amount equal to KRW 3,650 in an amount equal to KRW 3,650 in an amount equal to KRW 26,150 in an amount equal to the market price of KRW 2,500 in advance.

2. On April 25, 2020: around 18:00 to 18:15, the Defendant stolen the victim’s property by putting the victim’s property in a bridge where the victim’s D, who is the brate operator, was displayed at a different place in a cresh in which the surveillance was neglected. 1.8L, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 6,300, a large amount of 1,680, a large amount of carbling equivalent to KRW 12,980, a large amount of carbling, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 12,980, a total amount of 12,980, such as beer, etc., the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 2,00, in advance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of CCTV-faging statutes;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that an order of provisional payment shall continue to constitute a crime of the same kind with the reason for sentencing is not sufficient.

The defendant is in the status of military register and the amount of damage is not significant, and damage recovery is performed, and neighboring persons such as family members are in the protection or care of the defendant, and the equality is between the case where the judgment is rendered simultaneously with the crime in which the judgment becomes final and conclusive.