The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Some of the facts charged were corrected.

피고인들은 C, D과 함께 2015. 11. 경부터 같은 해 12. 6. 01:35 경까지 부산 부산진구 E 1 층에 있는 ‘F 게임 랜드’ 게임 장에서, C는 ‘ 더 피 싱’, ‘ 해적이야기’, ‘ 매 직 파티’ 게임 기 총 67대를 설치해 운영하면서, 손님들 로 하여금 자동 누름장치( 일명 ‘ 똑딱이’ )를 이용하여 위 게임을 이용하게 하고, 피고인들 등 종업원들은 손님들의 커피 심부름 및 게임을 통하여 획득한 점수에 상응하는 쿠폰을 발행하고, D은 위 게임 장 밖에서 대기하고 있다가 손님들이 가져온 쿠폰에 해당하는 점수 중 환전 수수료 10%를 제외하고 남은 금액을 현금으로 환전하여 주었다.

As a result, the Defendants exchanged tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game water in collusion with C and D, and caused them to perform speculative acts by using game water.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of C by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of a suspect of the police against D, and a third-time protocol concerning G, the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the results of execution of a warrant for search and inspection of seizure), investigation reports (a statement of customers in a game room);

1. The Defendants: Article 44(1)2 and Article 32(1)7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act; Article 30 of the Criminal Act; Article 44(1)1 and Article 28 of the Game Industry Promotion Act; Article 34(1)2 of the Criminal Act; Article 30 of the Criminal Act; Article 30 of the Criminal Act; Article 30 of the Criminal Act; and the selection of fines;

1. Defendants who are subject to aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act