However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 15, 2013, at around 20:55, the Defendant: (a) threatened the victim C (at the age of 72) in Busan Shipping Daegu B (at the age of 20:55); (b) threatened the victim with the other male in drinking alcohol on the ground that the victim is bad for drinking alcohol together with the other male and thereby drinking water (at the age of 30cm); and (c) threatened the victim with the above-mentioned improvement by putting three parts of the entrance door door door door of the victim’s front door door door, thereby breaking it up; and (d) threatened the victim with the improvement by threatening the victim to “this Chewing baby, what mari and mari, and all the dead.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act on the Punishment of Criminal Crimes; Article 366 of the Criminal Act; Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act; Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc.;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act shall not apply to the accused without any previous conviction or fine, and considering the agreement with the victim);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act of confiscation;