2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant is divided into his mistake, that the defendant is the first offender who has no criminal power, and that the defendant seems to have paid some money to the victims.

However, considering the fact that the nature of the crime of this case is not good, the amount of damage is considerable, and the victim did not reach an agreement with the victim until the court of the trial, and most of the damage is not recovered, the balance of sentencing with the same crime, the defendant's age, character and conduct and environment, the motive, means and consequence of the crime, and other various conditions of sentencing as shown in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.