요양불승인처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On October 21, 2010, the Plaintiff, as a construction worker for one-time work, was employed by the KNB Co., Ltd., and performed the work of installing and dismantling temporary permanent structures for the repair of facilities in the Samsung Electronic Co., Ltd., which is located in the Samsung Urban Co., Ltd., which is located in the Samsung Urban Co., Ltd. by July 12, 201.
B. From July 11, 2011, there were symptoms, such as the gular road, the gular road, the gular road, the gular road, and the galking, and the 15th day of the same month, which led to the rapid aggravation of the situation and the emergency transport to the galian hospital via the 119 rescue team.
At the early stage of treatment, the Plaintiff stated that “the Plaintiff was faced with her head before lurging,” and that “the brain transfusion was observed in his own margical image (MRI) and was presumed to be a witness for the merger of hurf infection, rather than due to the Plaintiff’s cerebral typhal typhosis, but was found to have discovered hurf virus (UV) in the brain typhal typhe test, and accordingly discovered hurf virus (UV) in the brain typhal typhe test.
C. On July 8, 2011, the Plaintiff asserted that, while working in the underground machine room, there was an accident where the Plaintiff saw back the back head with a safety cap worn in the pipe at a height of 1.5 meters above the ground, and that the occurrence of “bral-proof sugar, trauma-free props, and cerebrovassis” occurred, and on August 30, 201, the Plaintiff claimed medical care benefits to the Defendant on August 30, 201.
On October 7, 201, the Defendant issued a disposition of non-approval for medical care on the ground that the circumstance of the accident, such as the absence of the victims of the accident alleged by the Plaintiff, is unclear, and that the cerebral blood of the Plaintiff cannot be deemed due to credit under the medical record.
After that, the Plaintiff asserts that the two shocks occurred on July 8, 201 caused cerebral cerebral typhism by worsening the condition of the HHE infection, and on October 24, 2010, the Plaintiff was the Defendant to “HHE infection and cerebral typhism.”