(a) Business authorization and public notice - Business name: K urban environment rearrangement project implementer; Defendant - Business District: Defendant - Business District of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government L Lbropo-Gu (hereinafter referred to as “instant business area”) - Public notice on February 17, 201: Yeongdeungpo-gu M

(b) Adjudication on expropriation - Adjudication on expropriation on June 28, 2013 by local Land Tribunal of Seoul Special Metropolitan City - Commencement Date of expropriation: August 16, 2013 - Attached Form owned by the Plaintiffs

1. The term "object of expropriation" in the calculation of compensation amount means each piece of land above each piece of land on which each piece of land subject to expropriation is indicated as "each piece of land in this case", and the attachment when referring to some of them

1. It is specified as “land order” in the calculation of compensation money.

- An appraisal corporation (calculated on the basis of an arithmetic mean of the results of each appraisal by a new appraisal corporation and a third appraisal corporation)

C. This ruling - With respect to the plaintiffs on April 17, 2014 by the Central Land Tribunal based on the arithmetic mean of each appraisal result of an appraisal corporation (hereinafter the above appraisal corporation, appraisal corporation, and appraisal corporation, hereinafter referred to as “interest appraisal”)

1. The phrase "adjudication on an objection" in the calculation of compensation amount means the calculation [based grounds for recognition] of compensation amount for the plaintiffs, as described in the statement, there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' land list Nos. 4-1, 8-1, 18-1, 32-1, 32-2, 34-1, 35-1, and 36-1 should be evaluated as a site rather than a de facto private road. As such, the result of the court's appraisal in a case for preservation of evidence [in relation to each land Nos. 9, 9-1, 34, 34-1, 35, 35-1, the land No. 34-1, 35-1, which is evaluated as a site in this case] and the result of the court's appraisal in this court's order of land Nos. 4, 4-1, 5, 6, 8-1, 8-1, 18, 18-1, 32, 32-1, 32-1, 36-1, 37, each land of this case and each land of this case.