On May 2015, the Defendant planned to recruit land owners for the transportation of goods and to sell used freight vehicles to the borrower. “The transportation section is very stable with the fixed vehicle of large enterpriseF. The transportation section, at the Center in the Seoul Metropolitan Area, was set back at the Center in the Gu and U.S., after being set back at the Center in the Gu and U.S., at the Center in the Center in the Seoul Metropolitan Area, after being set back after being set at the shop in the first place. It would not work for the first day to have 10% of the industrial products loaded at the Center in the Seoul Metropolitan Area. At the lower time, it would be superior to the difference of the P.P. and the minor weight would be advantageous.The transportation charge would be approximately KRW 9.6 million in the monthly sales, KRW 4.3 million in the net profits, KRW 1.5 million in the daily transportation, and KRW 400,000 in the daily sales and KRW 24,000 in the next month in the company’s website.”

After that, the Defendant, who believed the above advertising as a fact, and visited the above company office, listened to the horses that “I do not do so unless I are fixed.” The Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “I will find it properly if you are. I will find it. our vehicle is the direct trade vehicle with F and can raise KRW 9.6 million per month.”

However, at the time of the contract, the above company was not in direct trade with FF, and it did not enter into a formal contract with H to supply the volume of the cargo of F. Therefore, even if the victim receives the purchase price of the used cargo from F., the victim did not have the intent or ability to supply the fixed cargo amount to the extent that the victim can earn profits of KRW 9.6 million per month and KRW 4.3 million per month.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and is a valuable cargo vehicle from the victim.