However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 29, 2015, at the main point of "C" located in Ansan-si B of Gyeonggi-do, and at around 112, the Defendant: (a) expressed that the victim F (32 years of age) who was a police officer of the Ansan Police Station D Zone D, which was called after having received a 112 report intends to return to the Defendant; (b) stated that the Defendant “I am back to the Defendant; (c) I am to the above E, “I am, I am back to the right edge; (d) I am walking back to the right edge of the above E; and (d) I continue to walk back the part of the victim F’s neck by hand with approximately 14 days, the victim’s hump is in need of treatment for about 14 days.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement of E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Articles 136 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Determination on the application of sentencing guidelines for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act: The scope of recommendations for sentencing guidelines for the application of the lower limit: consideration of all the circumstances, including the fact that there exists no record of force other than a fine of an O fine of the basic area (six to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties; and