Seized evidence 1 to 5 shall be confiscated, respectively.

The defendant.

1. The criminal defendant committed the above crime with a person who was unable to know the name of the so-called organization of the so-called singinginginging fraud, which received money by misrepresenting that person to an investigation agency by misrepresenting himself/herself, as if he/she requested an investigation agency to cooperate in the investigation (such as a name C, etc.).

In order to provide the defendant with a large number of relics (USIM, a mobile phone-based subscriber recognition pockets), VoIP Gawawawa (IP telephone users and subscription telephone-based relay equipment), and to inform the defendant of the method of use. The defendant relays communication by inserting a large number of depths into the Gawawa, and the defendant is unable to know his name, and the staff of the Gaishing who misrepresented the victims to the investigation agency by misrepresenting them to a large number of unspecified persons in China, and conspired to take charge of the role of inducing victims or receiving money from victims as they are employees of the Financial Supervisory Service.

Accordingly, on November 27, 2018, from around December 14, 2018 to around December 14, 2018, the Defendant relayed communications by inserting a large number of convictions, such as “F,” which was provided by a lighting staff member (one person C) who was unable to know the above name in his/her building D (one person C), into the Rowawawawawawawawawawawawa, and the name of whom is unknown, the Defendant called the victim B with the above “F” number on December 7, 2018 and called the victim B with the “F” number at a place where it is impossible to know the identity, and the account opened in his/her name was connected to the crime, and the Defendant called the “Seoul Central Inspection” to the Financial Supervisory Service’s employees, as the Defendant withdraws and instructs the money in his/her account to confirm the identity identity identity identity of the employee, and then, the victim appears to have known the name of the staff member in front of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Building at around 14:10 on that day.