When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 30, 2018, at around 04:46, the Defendant: (a) committed several violences on the part of the head of the G, on the ground that D’s chests and parts of the said G’s chests were sent to the site after receiving a report from 112 by G during the period when D, who is a customer of different tables, was sent to the scene, and that G was not informed of his personal information, even though G did not ask G to his personal information; and (b) assaulted by the buckbucks and ambucks of the said G, etc. on the ground that G’s chests were sent to the site.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case by the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to G and E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be determined as ordered by taking into consideration all the circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, environment, character and conduct, the background and consequence of the instant crime, the means and result of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc.