beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2017.06.28 2016고정266

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

D A Standing Director of the Agricultural Cooperatives, and the defendant is the defendant in the relationship of work as the director of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.

On May 28, 2016, the victim D had been moving to 2nd floor the office house located within the first floor for the purpose of remodeling the office with the employees, including the defendant, in the EF No. 1 The 1st floor, EF in Gyeonggi-si on May 28, 2016, and with the employees of the defendant, etc., during the process of moving the office house to 2nd floor for the purpose of remodeling the office, it is urgent for the defendant to have made a minor dispute with the defendant by issuing a certificate of the victim's work instruction, and after having come to 1st floor of the defendant who was employed on 2nd floor, the defect "A" as the defect "Iea" was changed to "Iea" (pathian, etc.).

The defendant also saw that "I am balp with the left hand of the defendant, and balp "I do not have to falp the defendant's balp" with the victim's balp, and balp with the victim's face once balp with the victim's balp, and the defendant continued to balp the defendant's face even after she exceeded the floor.

The Defendant, at the same time and at the same place, carried with the victim’s above assault as mentioned above, carried in flaps, pusheded with flaps, flapsed with flaps, flapsed with drinking face, and flapsed with 21 days after drinking the victim’s face, etc. (the Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the Defendant’s act against the victim was merely passive defensive acts and constitutes legitimate defense, but according to the evidence duly examined and adopted by this court, the Defendant’s use of force against the victim was not limited to a simple defensive act to defend unfair attack, but also can be recognized that the Defendant’s use of force against the victim was also recognized as having the nature of an attack, and thus, the above argument cannot be accepted). The summary of evidence cannot be accepted.

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of G, H, D, and I;

1. Each injury diagnosis certificate (D);

1.Each.