beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2017.08.22 2017고정186

정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the title “G” on the bulletin board of the E University Synet “F” without confirming the facts in the E University Women’s Dormitory room in D on September 23, 2016, and jointly with the following: (b) the Defendant is waiting for the E Team in cooperation with each other: (c) the relevant faculty, camping party, and the Ministry of Education.

At the level of studal harassment, entertainment business, accounting fraud, and accounting fraud. The professors who play at the level of early studal. The mid- to long-term university development fund of KRW 24.1 billion in 1 year without being newly constructed as a teacher to increase profits from the market price of approximately KRW 1.8 billion in 1 year, the basic property for profit-making by E private teaching institutes can be illegally sold, assigned professors to a position, the highest level hotel and studal harassment, the entertainment business establishment, and the entertainment business establishment, and the president of H had the right to participate in the 10 million won accounting fraud, I, and J, which spent personal treatment expenses from the accounts of school expenses. The professors against them were removed from office and violence by the professors against them.

교수가 폭력배들처럼 벌금형 선고 받아도 부끄러움이 없고 더욱 뻔뻔하다.

B. By posting a false statement on the following grounds: (a) ASEAN, the teaching staff of the Suhyup Cooperative led the selection and appointment of a temporary director or president; and (b) led E to the establishment of the basis for taking the private school of the Republic of Korea and the formation of E university into the origin of the private school of the Republic of Korea; and (c) thereby impairing the honor of the victim by disclosing false information via an information and communications network for the purpose of slandering the victim I professors, etc.

2. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc., and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s will specifically manifested pursuant to Article 70(3) of the same Act. The records of this case can be acknowledged that the victim I expressed his intent not to punish the defendant. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.