However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle with sod motor vehicle B.

On February 8, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.120% among blood transfusion around 21:00 and proceeded at a speed of about 30 km in time, depending on three lanes from the four-lane off the offline of the city of Daegu, Seogu, the 415-lane in front of the exit of the city of Daegu, to the four-lane in the active service.

The Defendant was in the influence of alcohol due to the negligence that the center line of yellow solid lines was obstructed and proceeded along the opposite lane while driving in a shooting line without properly operating the electric steering, steering, and operating the steering system, and due to the negligence that the Defendant was driving in the opposite lane, the front part of the DSS5 vehicle driven by the Defendant’s vehicle was driven by the Defendant’s front part in the front part of the car.

As a result, the Defendant driven the hurfed car in the state of alcohol, and the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim, such as approximately seven weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence, such as the right-wing frame, sake, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Statement report and investigation report on the situation of the driver at the main place of business (report on the situation of the driver at the main place of business);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 2 and 8 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 38 (2), and 50 of the said Act for the increase of concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Order to Attend a lecture by the defendant, causing the instant traffic accident while driving alcohol, causing serious injury to the victim, high drinking level, and the defendant is against the defendant's awareness of the instant crime, and there is no record of the same crime.