beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.08.23 2016노45 (1)

공무상비밀누설

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In light of the fact that the first commission contract entered into between Goyang-si and Goyang-si with the content that the defendant misleads the fact that the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part

subsection (b) of this section.

B. The sentence sentenced by the court below to the defendant (ten months of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, and 80 hours of community service) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the I Convention concluded between Goyang-si and P, which can be acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court on the assertion of facts, the P shall prepare and submit a business plan for performing entrusted duties by January 15 of each year, and shall consult with Goyang-si if it is changed, and shall specify the matters such as “the current status of employees and emergency contact system”, “the placement of employees by work section”, and “the placement of employees by work section,” etc. In the event of a vacancy in an employee who falls short of the appropriate employment standard for 39 persons, the lower court determined to reduce the entrusted business expenses to the extent corresponding to the vacancy (Articles 9, 11, 2, and 3 of the Convention, Articles 280, and 283 of the Evidence Record), ② Q is a driver of S corporation, an employee of P corporation as a business director of each company, and the Defendant did not register his/her employment in P corporation as evidence and evidence No. 376, 377 and 378).