소유권이전등기
1. On July 2017, the Defendant issued a sales contract for the right to sell real estate stated in the attached list to the Plaintiff.
1. Determination as to the cause of claim
A. (1) On December 15, 2016, C Corporation announced the invitation of occupants to E-family apartments built by D Co., Ltd.
The public announcement of the above recruitment is a house subject to the upper limit price system. The above apartment house is a house subject to the upper limit system. The house is not more than 85 square meters supplied in a public housing site developed by cancelling a development restriction zone and not less than 50 percent of the relevant district in the Seoul Metropolitan area is prohibited from resale for four years in cases of the exclusive use area of 84 square meters from the date when a contract for housing supply can be concluded for the first time under the Housing Act ( March 21, 2017). Provided, That the attached Table 3 of Article 73(1) [Attachment 3] of the Enforcement Decree of the Housing Act Article 73(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the Housing Act provides that "where the period of restriction on resale pursuant to subparagraph 4 (the house subject to the upper limit system system and the status selected as the occupant of the house) and subparagraph 5 (the status selected as the occupant of the house other than the public housing site exceeds three years, it shall be deemed that three years have elapsed when the registration of ownership transfer of the relevant house was completed."
(2) On December 28, 2016, according to the above recruitment notice, the Defendant applied for the special sale of the real estate subject to recommendation of the settlement support center for North Korean defectors, and acquired the ownership of the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) (hereinafter “instant ownership”).
(3) Around March 2017, the Defendant requested a licensed real estate agent affiliated with F Real Estate to resell the instant sales right by receiving money under the pretext of a premium.
Since then, the defendant decided to sell the sales right of this case with money in the name of the premium premium through the above licensed real estate agent, and the execution letter Gap for the transfer of the sales right of this case.