If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On October 13, 2012, around 15:10 on October 13, 2012, the Defendant: (a) discovered the Defendant by the victim E, an employee of the Defendant, and pointed out, and again, that he was aware of the fact that he was free of charge by deceiving the side of the mixed owners even before the discovery of the Defendant; and (b) stated, the Defendant was unable to avoid disturbance through sound over about 10 to 20 minutes on the floor of the said trading hole.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Application of the law to include some statements in the police interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;