2. It is recognized that the Defendants recognized the crime of this case to be erroneous, and that the amount of damage caused by the crime of this case is a small amount, Defendant A is a primary offender, Defendant B has no record of any particular criminal punishment except for those punished three times by the fine of this case.

However, the crime of this case is deemed to have been established by reducing a fine for summary order by taking account of the circumstances favorable to the Defendants, and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be newly considered in the trial after the pronouncement of the original judgment, and other various circumstances, including the Defendants’ age, environment, family relationship, circumstance leading up to the instant crime, circumstance leading up to the instant crime, and circumstance before and after the instant crime, etc., comprehensively considering the following: (a) Defendant A, in collusion with Defendant B, obtained one copy of the debit card of community credit cooperatives lost by the victim E; (b) obtained tobacco equivalent to KRW 29,400 in total by using the said credit card on two occasions; and (c) obtained by deceptioning the above credit card; (b) the details and frequency of the crime; and (c) the details of the crime; and (d) the details and frequency of the crime, etc.,

3. In conclusion, the defendants' appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendants' appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.