However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal power] On June 30, 2009, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Southern District Court, and on January 9, 2012, the Seoul Southern District Court issued a summary order of KRW 5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

On April 19, 2020, at around 22:42, the Defendant driven an EM6 vehicle while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.204% from the section of approximately 1.5km from the front of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the front of the parking lot D-dong of the 1st underground parking lot of the same Gu C.

As a result, the defendant has repeatedly driven a drunk even though he had the influence of drinking driving.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the circumstantial statement, investigation report, and notification of the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Investigation reports (reports on the confirmation of criminal records of the same kind of suspect), criminal records, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The details and punishment of the past drinking driving with the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the time interval from the former, the drinking volume in the instant case, the background of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc.