A shall be punished by a fine of one million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of seven hundred thousand won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

1. Defendant A

A. At around 08:10 on February 1, 2013, the Defendant injured the victim E, who heard from the victim the words “G and H are leaving a country”, and caused the victim’s face and chest to be pushed down with the breath hand, with the victim’s crypt, and the victim’s crypted and flapsed by drinking, the victim’s crypted cryp, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

B. The Defendant injured the victim B at the same time and place, where E had the assault described in the above paragraph (a) of the Defendant, fluencing the victim’s chest with his/her son, boomed twice the victim’s chest with his/her son, and boomed his/her body with his/her body two times as he/she met with the victim, etc., and put the victim into physical fighting for approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

2. Defendant B fighting with the body of the victim, such as facing the body from the victim A as set forth in paragraph 1(b) at the same time and place, and carried the victim’s face and water back to the victim by drinking the victim’s face and water back to the victim for about four weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness E, B, and A in part;

1. Legal statement of a witness I;

1. Each part of the police interrogation protocol against Defendants and E

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Reasons for judgment of conviction against damage, on-site photographs;

1. Defendant A made a vindication for the purport that Defendant A did not have inflicted any injury, such as the victim E and B.

The witness E and B stated in the investigative agency and this court that they suffered injury from Defendant A, and in light of their consistency, physical strength, rationality, and the degree of the testimony in this court, the credibility of this part of the statement is recognized, and the witness I also is a relatively objective witness.