However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant, on November 6, 2008, filed a complaint with C to the effect that “C was found at the Defendant’s restaurant on November 10, 2008, and was unable to get criminal punishment.” However, on November 10, 2008, the Defendant filed a complaint with C to the public service center in the Bupyeong-gu Police Station located in the Bupyeong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gangwon-gu, Gangwon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on November 6, 2008 to the effect that “C was found at the Defendant’s restaurant, and was unable to get the Defendant’s entrustment.” The Defendant filed a complaint with the intention of having C receive criminal punishment.

2. Although a person wishing to run a lodging business in violation of the notarial Sanitary Control Act must report to the competent authorities, the Defendant, without filing a report with the competent authorities on the lodging business, operated the lodging business by receiving money equivalent to KRW 100,000,000 won per day from the non-registered customers in his name in Gangwon-gun from February 17, 2007 to February 8, 2010, and KRW 700,000,000 won per month, from the non-registered customers in his name, to the lodging business.

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Copy of the protocol of examination of suspect C by the prosecution;

1. A copy of the prosecutor's statement concerning the F;

1. C (one time, two times), and each police suspect examination protocol of G;

1. The police statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with F (two times);

1. The defendant's certificate;

1. Written accusation and accusation of the Sejong Chang-gun;

1. Voluntary statement of H;

1. Complaints of the accused;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes with nine copies of photograph (two copies of investigation records)

1. Relevant Article 156 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 156 of the Criminal Act, Article 20 (1) 1 and Article 3 (1) of the Public Health Control Act, and the selection of imprisonment for each type of crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act [limited to the period of punishment plus the maximum term of two crimes] among concurrent crimes;

1. The defendant and the defense counsel regarding the assertion of the defendant and the defense counsel under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following circumstances are considered in light of the reasons for sentencing).