However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 23, 2017, the Defendant, at around 17:30 on July 23, 2017, posted by the victim C (the age of 16) at the Defendant’s dwelling in the Daegu-gu apartment B apartment 101-dong 902, Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 101-dong 2, 201, would donate cosmetics to the victim in writing on his own

At the same time, the approach was made.

The defendant continuously requested the victim to send the photographs and videos exposed to the chest to the victim, and had the photographs and videos exposed to the chest from the victim to the Kakao Stockholm.

On July 24, 2017, around 09:22, the following day, the Defendant sent a Kakao Stockholm message to the victim’s cell phone using the victim’s photograph and screen image as a means of crypting that the victim did not respond to his own telephone and text message at the rest area of the Gyeong-si, Jin-si, Jin-si, Jin-si, Jin-si, Jin-si, the following day:

If one does not accept his own request, the victim made intimidation as if he were aware of the victim's photograph and video.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the Canadian screen to the upper part of a Handphone screen and the Stockholm screen;

1. Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act and selection of punishment for the crime;

1. In full view of all the circumstances, including the fact that the defendant's reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act recognizes and reflects his mistake, the details of the crime, the method of the crime, the degree of damage, and the criminal records of the defendant, the sentence is rendered as ordered.