However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around July 22, 2015, the Defendant, in collusion with D on September 2, 2014, declared a fine of KRW 5 million as a violation of the Mountainous Districts Management Act (the foregoing Court Decision 2015No504, Feb. 4, 2016) on the charge of raising soil at a height of about three meters on the 978 square meters of the above forest land, in collusion with D on the owner of the forest land in Gwangju City, and on the charge of piling up the said forest at a height of about 3 meters.

From October 27, 2014 to June 19, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received an order from Gwangju City to restore the said forest to its original state; and (b) had the said D restore the forest to its original state upon receiving an order from Gwangju City to restore the said forest to its original state; and (c) had the said D, E, and F present a letter of complaint to the effect that the testimony was false from the fact that D, E, and F testified testified.

On January 7, 2016, the Defendant drafted a false complaint with respect to D, E, and F at the attorney-at-law office located in Seongbuk-gu G in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si.

A written complaint was presented to the effect that “Defendant D, E, and F appeared as a witness for a violation of the Mountainous Districts Management Act against the Defendant at around July 8, 2015 at the above court No. 2015Da504 of the above court and taken an oath, and that the Defendant requested D to make a request to make a balance on the front of the forests and fields.” In addition, Defendant D had proved to the effect that “The Defendant made a request to make a deposit on the front of the forests and fields more than the Defendant made a request to make a balance (However, the number No. 3 was deleted)” was punished for the total of 12 matters as shown in the attached list of crimes in the attached list of crimes, and the fact that “The above D, E, and F testified testified only for the fact that Defendant D, E, and F was the only witness.”

Nevertheless, the defendant submitted the above complaint to the public service center of the Suwon District Public Prosecutor's Office located in 451, according to the nature of the Si/Gun/Gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and to employees whose name is unknown.

The purpose of this is to enable D, E, and F to be subject to criminal punishment.