beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.03.28 2018고정13

주차장법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The attached parking lot shall not be used for any purpose other than the parking lot, and a person responsible for the management of the attached parking lot shall maintain the original function of the attached parking lot so that users of the relevant facilities may not interfere with the use of the attached parking lot.

From October 24, 2012, the Defendant leased the former C and the first floor of the building in Ansan-si, the following: (a) from October 24, 2012, the Defendant: (b) was placed in the parking lot attached to the said DD store from October 7, 2016 to February 8, 2017; (c) placed the boxes of goods sold at the said D store; or (d) installed the “rawls car”, which is a kind of rail for carrying out the functions of loading and transporting goods, and did not maintain the original function of the parking lot attached to the attached parking lot.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of each police officer against the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written accusation;

1. Evidence and photographs produced by the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment to the rulings, etc. of the same kind);

1. Article 29 (2) 2 and Article 19-4 (2) of the relevant Act on the Parking of Motor Vehicles under the relevant Act on the Punishment of Motor Vehicles (Optional to a punishment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Reasons for conviction under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment;

1. Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion

A. In order to confirm the quantity of the supplied goods, the Defendant: (a) set up a roller in the parking lot; and (b) set up a roller machine that can move; and (c) did not make it impossible to maintain the function of the parking lot.

B. The Defendant, upon receiving a disposition of non-prosecution disposition on the charge of violating the Parking Lot Act three times, believed that his act was not a crime, and there are justifiable grounds for such misunderstanding, constitutes legal errors under Article 16 of the Criminal Act.

2. Determination

(a) temporarily keep waste materials, such as books, chairss and glass windows, on one column of the attached parking lot of the building, and the area of the vehicle has almost little impact on the parking of the vehicle;