임금
1. The instant lawsuit is an order for payment issued on March 26, 2015 for the wage case of Seoul Northern District Court 2015 tea1470, Seoul Northern District Court. < Amended by Act No. 13290, May 17, 2015>
On March 16, 2015, the Plaintiff applied for a payment order against the Defendant as Seoul Northern District Court 2015 tea1470, and the said court issued the payment order (hereinafter “instant payment order”) on March 26, 2015, and served the original copy of the instant payment order to the Defendant on April 2, 2015, and filed a written objection against the instant payment order with the above court on April 9, 2015. Accordingly, the instant case of application for the payment order was implemented under the same court 2015Gaso29139, and was extended on June 30, 2015, and was cultivated under the instant lawsuit on July 22, 2015 due to the Plaintiff’s extension of the Plaintiff’s claim for the payment order.
In full view of the overall purport of the pleadings in the statement No. 1-2, No. 1-2, No. 7, No. 14, and No. 7, whether C who filed an objection to the instant payment order had the authority to represent the defendant, the chairperson D is a legitimate representative of the defendant and C has no authority to represent the defendant, and as such, C’s objection as of April 9, 2015 is unlawful, since it is acknowledged that around April 2015, the original copy of the instant payment order was served on the defendant, and C had no authority to represent the defendant, such as acting representative.
Therefore, the instant payment order is finalized on April 17, 2015 after two weeks from the date on which the original copy was served to the Defendant, and since the instant lawsuit was terminated by itself, it is so decided as per Disposition by C’s rejection of objection as of April 9, 2015, and by declaring that the instant lawsuit has been terminated.